Ninja says bans shouldnât apply to âcontent creatorsâ âThereâs a difference between a content creator who has millions of subscribers, who then gets banned from what makes him money, and some kid who is just a piece of **** who has zero followers, zero money from gaming and hacks,â Blevins stated.
âYou ban that kid and nothing happens to him. Nothing happens. Oh no! He canât cheat any more. You ban Jarvis â itâs different.â
After receiving pushback on this from his companions in Fortnite, Blevins reiterated his argument. âA content creator cheating, whose entire life is about the game heâs playing and then some random who has no YouTube channel, no Twitter account â he doesnât even care, he just cheats, he has to hack â you ban one, you ruin his life. You ban the other, he makes another account and keeps cheating.â
Blevins did concede that cheating and recording it was silly but argued that if Logan Paul didnât get penalised for filming a hanged corpse, then Faze Jarvis should also not get penalised. âLogan Paul literally filmed someone hanging in a forest and his channel didnât get banned and heâs been perfectly fine,â Blevins said.
âIn that aspect, he was a YouTuber, a big one, and he didnât get banned. YouTube decided that he was big enough to not get banned.â
Epic Games has not at the time of writing responded to Blevinsâ remarks regarding their terms of service, which it should be noted, differ considerably from YouTubeâs.
https://www.greenmangaming.com/newsroom ... ze-jarvis/