Dowbocop wrote:We can say Chelsea have been reduced to signing Arsenal rejects.
That's the only positive I've got so far.
Don't Arsenal get a decent chunk of the fee? I am surprised they didn't try and resign him (they have first refusal) but I have also heard that within the club, they felt it was better to take the money and pursue fresh options.
And it is stupid to think Man United aren't a big draw. The lack of CL football - for just one season, potentially - doesn't outweigh the fact that they are establish as a Champions League winning club.
They have more going for them than Arsenal and City in that respect. They aren't just a team that traditionally turn ed up in the second round or quarter finals - they challenged for it. They know their way around Europe and how to beat the elite consistently. Yes, obviously, I am talking past tense here, but when players dont watch a team week in, week out (and live abroad) it is not just getting in the CL that counts - it is knocking out the big guns and winning it. And that will stick in the memory, as United have been doing it for years. They have a richer CL heritage than Chelsea, Arsenal or City. Liverpool still feed off their successes in Europe, despite having a lengthy absence from the tournament.