Atreyu wrote:
Would that be the same Borders that no longer exists in the UK, then?
Waterstones already suffers from the phenomenon of people heading into its stores, flicking through a book and, if they like it, scanning in the barcode to the Amazon app on their phones.
At least Waterstones still serves a very wide proportion of the public, not all of whom like shopping on the interweb or who otherwise like shopping for books at a bricks-and-mortar bookshop... which you can't really say for GAME. It's on the way out, surely.
Indeed, Borders did go under, maybe Waterstones will too once their primary clientèle get old and die. But in that case then every high street shop is doomed for the same reason.
The point I'm trying to make is that high street shops fundamentally cannot compete with online stores on prices. Can't be done. Simple economics will keep online overheads significantly lower than high street ones and that gap, however narrowed, will never be overcome. As such, there is no point in GAME or any other high street store trying to make price their primary battleground. Their prices should be as low as possible obviously, but it's a battle they can't win. Instead, what GAME should concentrate on is what they can offer that the online shops cannot; namely a hands on, interactive, service-driven environment. Play pods, comfy sofas, maybe a drink or something while you try out a game. Hell, have a system where you can pay £5 for an hour's free playing and if you like it, they'll take the £5 off the price of the game.
Would that save them? Don't know, maybe it's simply a business serving a demographic who want to buy online and they should sell up and buy out. All I'm saying is that GAME can't compete on price and should stop trying, and should focus on a battle it can win.
_________________
Lagamorph wrote:
If you don't want her vagina to smell of vagina, what do you want it to smell of?
Skarjo's Scary Stories...