The Wrestling Thread: WWE WrestleMania 31 [NSFW]

Our best bits.
Baron Zemo
Member
Joined in 2009
AKA: Jim

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Baron Zemo » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:09 am

Ryan0rz wrote:How did WWE strawberry float this up so bad? Listen to the pop!



:wub:


That Undertaker is the best Undertaker :wub:

EDIT: It was the WWF :wub:

Corazon de Leon

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Corazon de Leon » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:28 am

Guess who had no. 29 in the house sweepstake? 8-)

User avatar
Rog
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: Cleethorpes

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Rog » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:29 am

Image

Rumble. Been. Gone. Tired. Head hurts. Can't sleep. Too. Many. Numbers.

You're not going to fuking believe this sh!t.

WWE Royal Rumble
ROTS - 13
El Luchadore Trufaxes - 11
Psychopriest - 11
Mockmaster - 9
AJ Styles - 8
Lonestar - 8
Zellery - 8
Hank Scorpio - 8
Jam-Master-Jay - 8
Balloon Sod - 7
Sykes - 7
KKLEIN - 7
Bork - 7
Chocolate Jim - 7
Phatman - 7
Ginga - 7
Baronzeeeemoooo- 7
Deadpool - 6
Irene Demova - 6
Lucien - 6
Sw26 - 6
BOhero - 6
E-man - 6
Gaminglegend - 6
Prototype - 6
Adam Pollard - 5
Pell - DISQUALIFIED

Yep, ROTS wins his 3rd IN A ROW. Good thing I haven't bought his double prize yet (bought a new TV, sorry ROTS :oops: ) he'll not get a triple mystery uber prize! Surely he can't make it four?!

GRAPL LEADERBOARD
Return of the star - 118
Fuking Zellery - 115
Mockmaster - 112
Deadpool - 110
Balloon Sod - 109
Hank Scorpio - 108
sw26 - 102
El Luchadore Trufaxes - 100
Born Skippy - 99
Chocolate Jim - 99
Sykes - 98
AJ STYLES - 96
Lonestar - 94
KKLEIN - 94
E-man - 94
Teh Bork - 90
Lucien - 89
Irene Demova - 86
BOhero - 85
Gaminglegend - 82
Adam Pollard - 72
Ginga - 72
Prototype - 62
Drumstick- 56
Dark Dragon 64 - 54
Cropolite - 51
Baronzemo - 50
Ironmaiden - 46
Phatman - 19
Vesp - 18
Jam-master Jay - 16
The Floex - 11

Unsurprisingly ROTS is now top. Got a nice lead on Zellery and goes to show that winning PPVs is the way to get ahead instead of grinding. The pressure is now on him to end ROTS epic winning streak before it spells the ruin of his chances at first place. With only 2 events left things are about to get good.

See you at Elimination Chamber!

Last edited by Rog on Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pell
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: The scarlet fields of Can'-Ka No Rey
Contact:

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Pell » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:33 am

:|

User avatar
Rog
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: Cleethorpes

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Rog » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:41 am

Pell wrote::|

:?:

Baron Zemo
Member
Joined in 2009
AKA: Jim

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Baron Zemo » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:42 am

"I need a BaronZeeeeemmoooooo"

User avatar
Pell
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: The scarlet fields of Can'-Ka No Rey
Contact:

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Pell » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:55 am

Rog wrote:
Pell wrote::|

:?:


Pell wrote:I hope I get fewer points than anyone else but here goes:

ECW Championship - Christian (c) vs. Ezekiel Jackson (worth double)
Winner: Ezekiel Jackson

World Heavyweight Championship - The Undertaker (c) vs. Rey Mysterio (worth double)
Winner: The Undertaker

WWE Championship - Sheamus (c) vs. Randy Orton (worth double)
Winner: Sheamus

WWE Women's Championship - Michelle McCool (c) vs. Mickie James
Winner: Michelle McCool

Brand of Rumble Winner - Raw, Smackdown or ECW
Brand: Raw

Who will last longest in the Rumble?
Prediction: HBK

Who will last the least amount of time?
Prediction: Chris Jericho

Who will get the most eliminations?
Prediction: HBK

30-Man Royal Rumble Match - WORTH 5 POINTS!
Winner: John Cena


Still rooting for a Jericho win though. :wub:



Were we supposed to PM them too? Oh well, it's not as though I did well - I just thought Poll would appreciate some company there at the bottom. :P

User avatar
Rog
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: Cleethorpes

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Rog » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:15 pm

Pell wrote:
Rog wrote:
Pell wrote::|

:?:


Pell wrote:I hope I get fewer points than anyone else but here goes:

ECW Championship - Christian (c) vs. Ezekiel Jackson (worth double)
Winner: Ezekiel Jackson

World Heavyweight Championship - The Undertaker (c) vs. Rey Mysterio (worth double)
Winner: The Undertaker

WWE Championship - Sheamus (c) vs. Randy Orton (worth double)
Winner: Sheamus

WWE Women's Championship - Michelle McCool (c) vs. Mickie James
Winner: Michelle McCool

Brand of Rumble Winner - Raw, Smackdown or ECW
Brand: Raw

Who will last longest in the Rumble?
Prediction: HBK

Who will last the least amount of time?
Prediction: Chris Jericho

Who will get the most eliminations?
Prediction: HBK

30-Man Royal Rumble Match - WORTH 5 POINTS!
Winner: John Cena


Still rooting for a Jericho win though. :wub:



Were we supposed to PM them too? Oh well, it's not as though I did well - I just thought Poll would appreciate some company there at the bottom. :P


Oh right well I'm sorry to do this to you mate but.......
Image
YOU'RE DISQUALIFIED!

Deadline was at 11pm.

User avatar
Pell
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: The scarlet fields of Can'-Ka No Rey
Contact:

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Pell » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:21 pm

BOOOOOO!

User avatar
Rog
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: Cleethorpes

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Rog » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:23 pm

Image
You would've had 5 points though.

User avatar
Cardinal Chunder
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: CosmoKramer
Location: Koholint Island

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Cardinal Chunder » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:10 pm

Just noticed Jericho was sporting a rather lovely black eye last night.

User avatar
Zellery
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Zellery » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:18 pm

It doesn't go to show that winning PPV's is the way to get top, I had 9 points taken off me for submitting one PPV's answers 20 minutes late. 8-)

User avatar
Rog
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: Cleethorpes

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Rog » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:21 pm

Zellery wrote:It doesn't go to show that winning PPV's is the way to get top, I had 9 points taken off me for submitting one PPV's answers 20 minutes late. 8-)


They weren't taken off you, you never earnt them in the first place.

User avatar
Zellery
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Zellery » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:32 pm

Rog wrote:
Zellery wrote:It doesn't go to show that winning PPV's is the way to get top, I had 9 points taken off me for submitting one PPV's answers 20 minutes late. 8-)


They weren't taken off you, you never earnt them in the first place.

I still scored 9 points regardless. It was 9:20pm or something like that which is still obviously in time for the live event but for that stupid stipulation the Champion has.

All I meant was if I'd posted 20 minutes earlier it would have counted, thus meaning winning PPV's doesn't prove how you win.

Besides it was proven last year that you can win by grinding as I did just that.

User avatar
Rog
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: Cleethorpes

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Rog » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:34 pm

Zellery wrote:
Rog wrote:
Zellery wrote:It doesn't go to show that winning PPV's is the way to get top, I had 9 points taken off me for submitting one PPV's answers 20 minutes late. 8-)


They weren't taken off you, you never earnt them in the first place.

I still scored 9 points regardless. It was 9:20pm or something like that which is still obviously in time for the live event but for that stupid stipulation the Champion has.

All I meant was if I'd posted 20 minutes earlier it would have counted, thus meaning winning PPV's doesn't prove how you win.

Besides it was proven last year that you can win by grinding as I did just that.


Last year was only 3 rounds. You were a flash in the pan, son. Your destruction is here, right now. Grinding is being proven inferior in this, the first real season of GRAPL.

User avatar
Zellery
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Zellery » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:36 pm

The first season was short because it was new and exciting, this product's gone stale Rog, I reinvented GRAPL and now you've turned it into a long, dull, drawn out mess.

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by KK » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:47 pm

On the Wrestling Observer Radio, they seem to be of the opinion that the matches originally lined up for WrestleMania are still in place, it's just a question of how they get there between now & March.

I personally was expecting Undertaker Vs Shawn Michaels for the title, because do they really want to do the exact same match again this year? You'd want to up the ante, surely? And it being for the World Title would be it. I suppose you could do some sort of retirement stipulation. They're going to have Michaels lose to Taker for the second year?

I mean, just because Edge won the Rumble, it doesn't necessarily mean anything either. Vince McMahon won the Rumble match in 1999 but didn't go on to WrestleMania & John Cena did in 2008 but faced Orton for the title the very next month at No Way Out.

Image
User avatar
Zellery
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Zellery » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:52 pm

So me and Jim won the fuking Rumble sweepstakes too? 8-)

User avatar
Chocolate Jim
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Chocolate Jim » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:01 pm

Zellery wrote:So me and Jim won the fuking Rumble sweepstakes too? 8-)


Indeed ... we are like a tag that have underlying beef with one another motherfuker.
*can't think of a good example

Image
User avatar
Zellery
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
by Zellery » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:05 pm

Chocolate Jim wrote:
Zellery wrote:So me and Jim won the fuking Rumble sweepstakes too? 8-)


Indeed ... we are like a tag that have underlying beef with one another motherfuker.
*can't think of a good example

Like The Rock and Sock, I'm The Rock, a main eventer aiming high, while you lumber around in the background like Mankind, spelling words wrong and eating chocolate.


Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 295 guests