Page 941 of 4796
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:09 am
by Baron Zemo
Ryan0rz wrote:How did WWE strawberry float this up so bad? Listen to the pop!
That Undertaker is the best Undertaker
EDIT: It was the WWF
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:28 am
by Corazon de Leon
Guess who had no. 29 in the house sweepstake?
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:29 am
by Rog
Rumble. Been. Gone. Tired. Head hurts. Can't sleep. Too. Many. Numbers.
You're not going to fuking believe this sh!t.
WWE Royal RumbleROTS - 13
El Luchadore Trufaxes - 11
Psychopriest - 11
Mockmaster - 9
AJ Styles - 8
Lonestar - 8
Zellery - 8
Hank Scorpio - 8
Jam-Master-Jay - 8
Balloon Sod - 7
Sykes - 7
KKLEIN - 7
Bork - 7
Chocolate Jim - 7
Phatman - 7
Ginga - 7
Baronzeeeemoooo- 7
Deadpool - 6
Irene Demova - 6
Lucien - 6
Sw26 - 6
BOhero - 6
E-man - 6
Gaminglegend - 6
Prototype - 6
Adam Pollard - 5
Pell - DISQUALIFIED
Yep, ROTS wins his 3rd IN A ROW. Good thing I haven't bought his double prize yet (bought a new TV, sorry ROTS
) he'll not get a triple mystery uber prize! Surely he can't make it four?!
GRAPL LEADERBOARDReturn of the star - 118
Fuking Zellery - 115
Mockmaster - 112
Deadpool - 110
Balloon Sod - 109
Hank Scorpio - 108
sw26 - 102
El Luchadore Trufaxes - 100
Born Skippy - 99
Chocolate Jim - 99
Sykes - 98
AJ STYLES - 96
Lonestar - 94
KKLEIN - 94
E-man - 94
Teh Bork - 90
Lucien - 89
Irene Demova - 86
BOhero - 85
Gaminglegend - 82
Adam Pollard - 72
Ginga - 72
Prototype - 62
Drumstick- 56
Dark Dragon 64 - 54
Cropolite - 51
Baronzemo - 50
Ironmaiden - 46
Phatman - 19
Vesp - 18
Jam-master Jay - 16
The Floex - 11
Unsurprisingly ROTS is now top. Got a nice lead on Zellery and goes to show that winning PPVs is the way to get ahead instead of grinding. The pressure is now on him to end ROTS epic winning streak before it spells the ruin of his chances at first place. With only 2 events left things are about to get good.
See you at Elimination Chamber!
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:33 am
by Pell
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:41 am
by Rog
Pell wrote::|
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:42 am
by Baron Zemo
"I need a BaronZeeeeemmoooooo"
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:55 am
by Pell
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:15 pm
by Rog
Oh right well I'm sorry to do this to you mate but.......
YOU'RE DISQUALIFIED!Deadline was at 11pm.
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:21 pm
by Pell
BOOOOOO!
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:23 pm
by Rog
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:10 pm
by Cardinal Chunder
Just noticed Jericho was sporting a rather lovely black eye last night.
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:18 pm
by Zellery
It doesn't go to show that winning PPV's is the way to get top, I had 9 points taken off me for submitting one PPV's answers 20 minutes late.
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:21 pm
by Rog
Zellery wrote:It doesn't go to show that winning PPV's is the way to get top, I had 9 points taken off me for submitting one PPV's answers 20 minutes late.
They weren't taken off you, you never earnt them in the first place.
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:32 pm
by Zellery
Rog wrote:Zellery wrote:It doesn't go to show that winning PPV's is the way to get top, I had 9 points taken off me for submitting one PPV's answers 20 minutes late.
They weren't taken off you, you never earnt them in the first place.
I still scored 9 points regardless. It was 9:20pm or something like that which is still obviously in time for the live event but for that stupid stipulation the Champion has.
All I meant was if I'd posted 20 minutes earlier it would have counted, thus meaning winning PPV's doesn't prove how you win.
Besides it was proven last year that you can win by grinding as I did just that.
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:34 pm
by Rog
Zellery wrote:Rog wrote:Zellery wrote:It doesn't go to show that winning PPV's is the way to get top, I had 9 points taken off me for submitting one PPV's answers 20 minutes late.
They weren't taken off you, you never earnt them in the first place.
I still scored 9 points regardless. It was 9:20pm or something like that which is still obviously in time for the live event but for that stupid stipulation the Champion has.
All I meant was if I'd posted 20 minutes earlier it would have counted, thus meaning winning PPV's doesn't prove how you win.
Besides it was proven last year that you can win by grinding as I did just that.
Last year was only 3 rounds. You were a flash in the pan, son. Your destruction is here, right now. Grinding is being proven inferior in this, the first real season of GRAPL.
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:36 pm
by Zellery
The first season was short because it was new and exciting, this product's gone stale Rog, I reinvented GRAPL and now you've turned it into a long, dull, drawn out mess.
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:47 pm
by KK
On the Wrestling Observer Radio, they seem to be of the opinion that the matches originally lined up for WrestleMania are still in place, it's just a question of how they get there between now & March.
I personally was expecting Undertaker Vs Shawn Michaels for the title, because do they really want to do the exact same match again this year? You'd want to up the ante, surely? And it being for the World Title would be it. I suppose you could do some sort of retirement stipulation. They're going to have Michaels lose to Taker for the second year?
I mean, just because Edge won the Rumble, it doesn't necessarily mean anything either. Vince McMahon won the Rumble match in 1999 but didn't go on to WrestleMania & John Cena did in 2008 but faced Orton for the title the very next month at No Way Out.
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:52 pm
by Zellery
So me and Jim won the fuking Rumble sweepstakes too?
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:01 pm
by Chocolate Jim
Zellery wrote:So me and Jim won the fuking Rumble sweepstakes too?
Indeed ... we are like a tag that have underlying beef with one another motherfuker.
*can't think of a good example
Re: The Wrestling Thread: WWE Royal Rumble coverage (pg1)
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:05 pm
by Zellery
Chocolate Jim wrote:Zellery wrote:So me and Jim won the fuking Rumble sweepstakes too?
Indeed ... we are like a tag that have underlying beef with one another motherfuker.
*can't think of a good example
Like The Rock and Sock, I'm The Rock, a main eventer aiming high, while you lumber around in the background like Mankind, spelling words wrong and eating chocolate.