I heard from a trap artist trying to squeeze through under an alias (because you're penniless, right? It's for personal use, right?) art they don't own with like 20 million listens on Spotify or whatever. This isn't the first time it's happened. People contact you using aliases because they think it hides who they actually are. Ok, whatever, looks like you have an audience, and maybe do well out of it, great. Let's take a look at your original artwork you 100% commissioned from your designer and paid them for that.
Won't use the enquiry form so of course going to e-mail directly because too important for that gooseberry fool (which means not filling out the quantity required, budget, or basic contact information, which is again just wasting time withholding important information).
Recursive image search some images that happen to be 1080p, PNG format, and I'm very confident the randomly generated string of letters and numbers that VLC saves as screenshots.
Yup, they're stills from a film. Why the strawberry float do even successful musicians think just whacking images on shirts for resale is totally not a risk?
Hey,
Thanks for getting in touch. I know you have a few aliases so I'd be interested in working with you but will be winding things down for the holidays at the end of the week and am not able to accept any more pre-holiday orders since a week or so ago.
The main sticking point is you would need permission from Sony and the Walt Disney Company to produce these as is, because they own the still photography as well.
As if this needed pointing out. For strawberry float's sake. I then went on to explain why as a sole trader with no limited liability or legal protection I could be potentially bankrupted by either of two of the world's biggest entertainment corporations with their respective merchandising operations.
Just get that gooseberry fool printed on VistaPrint Redbubble or whatever before they notice and piss off. If you want to try and sneak in film stills as your own artwork, as if you're Uniclo, at least strawberry floating say it and stop wasting my time with things that could cost me everything, because you were kind enough not to point it out. I've had a few of these where they moan about copyright policies on the DIY gooseberry fool (as if there's no good reason they exist) and then they think, oh that small independent business down the road with no lawyers will just take on the risk instead, hope they don't notice lol.
And of course they would tick the box that says "I have legal permission and rights to use this image" if they did it that way.
I am so appreciating my habit of doing this every time now. Half the time I do it to find alternative copies of corporate images that they themselves can't tell are terrible compressed versions and I have to find it on the Internet instead, which is hilarious. It's literally faster to do that then to ask for a vector graphic, explain what that is, wait weeks and then get the same file resized to 100x or saved as strawberry floating word document or something.
Late the other night I realised I spent an hour and a half explaining all of this, because sometimes that kind of frank and considerate information fills in the gaps in someone's knowledge, or is just clueless. Sometimes that's enough to win some over thinking, "oh hey gooseberry fool, I hadn't thought of that". Unlikely. They know exactly what they're asking for. I answer all the questions in their email anyway and explain why it's not possible as it is because it's strawberry floating illegal man. I guess I still lose, because I just lost an hour and a half of my time thinking the father of trap is going to have their gooseberry fool in order.
It's just not true, sometimes it's the successful people who don't give a strawberry float and want stupid things, like they've lost their mind.
And yes, trap is strawberry floating shite so I should have known what to expect. I dunno maybe the guy is flush enough to actually pay for the copyright clearances but he self publishes so nope, that aint gonna happen.