GRcade

BCFC Fan wrote:1. I know he has used the word, but at the same time fellow South Americans have supported him, as I say for the 3rd time. He at the time (and still now) speaks little English and would have been unaware of the meaning of the word in England.

2. It doesn't matter if it's not one mans word, it's true that he did say it, but did not know of the consequences in saying it.

3. Liverpool's story kept changing, Suarez's didn't. Evra is a cretin.

4/5. In that case the punishment was even more ridiculous than I'd previously thought. So the FA knew he wasn't being racist yet still charged him?

6. Liverpool didn't appeal because it's clear that the FA will always back anything to do with Man Utd and doing so would be pointless. Their American owners also wouldn't have liked the anti Liverpool image that the 'Fergie' media was creating which is completely understandable.

7. I'm not saying Terry has anything to do with the Suarez case. Simply using it as an example of the double standards in this country and I'll guarantee now that nothing will come of the case, despite of the video evidence clearly showing the truth.

Preezy, piss off.

i've already addressed most of this but you mysteriously ignored it. presumably because it would conflict with your knee jerk reaction that has no relation to the reality of the situation.

glowy69 wrote:He isnt BCFC, a guy who has won everything and dominated english football for 20 years is not a "banana split"

i disagree

8raz wrote:

BCFC Fan wrote:1. I know he has used the word, but at the same time fellow South Americans have supported him, as I say for the 3rd time. He at the time (and still now) speaks little English and would have been unaware of the meaning of the word in England.

2. It doesn't matter if it's not one mans word, it's true that he did say it, but did not know of the consequences in saying it.

3. Liverpool's story kept changing, Suarez's didn't. Evra is a cretin.

4/5. In that case the punishment was even more ridiculous than I'd previously thought. So the FA knew he wasn't being racist yet still charged him?

6. Liverpool didn't appeal because it's clear that the FA will always back anything to do with Man Utd and doing so would be pointless. Their American owners also wouldn't have liked the anti Liverpool image that the 'Fergie' media was creating which is completely understandable.

7. I'm not saying Terry has anything to do with the Suarez case. Simply using it as an example of the double standards in this country and I'll guarantee now that nothing will come of the case, despite of the video evidence clearly showing the truth.

Preezy, piss off.

i've already addressed most of this but you mysteriously ignored it. presumably because it would conflict with your knee jerk reaction that has no relation to the reality of the situation.

Of course you did.

You can't educate an idiot sadly.

DML wrote:You can't educate an idiot sadly.

Your only an idiot if you post something stupid, which I haven't. All I've seen is flawed arguements which I've shown to be false. The double standards on here are also incredible, if I was defending John Terry, I wouldn't get half as much abuse.

Now stop sulking about Pompey being on the brink of liquidation DML, and enjoy L1 while you can.

Didnt you say though that Shelvey and henderson where going to be like xavi and iniesta in a few years? Surely as stupid as that comment is, defines you as an idiot

BCFC Fan wrote:Of course you did.

i'm not sure you should be weighing into this discussion anymore if you're going to disregard any post that challenges your position. sad but expected really when the alternative is to actually defend your shitty views.

glowy69 wrote:Didnt you say though that Shelvey and henderson where going to be like xavi and iniesta in a few years? Surely as stupid as that comment is, defines you as an idiot

Someone has said this before, it may have been you, Glowy. Again I will say, come back in 2017 as we will see.

It was Iniesta and Fabregas by they way.

BCFC Fan wrote:All I've seen is flawed arguements which I've shown to be false.

this is not what happened at all, you banana split.

8raz wrote:

BCFC Fan wrote:Of course you did.

i'm not sure you should be weighing into this discussion anymore if you're going to disregard any post that challenges your position. sad but expected really when the alternative is to actually defend your shitty views.

You put that you've already answered most of my points which you haven't, hardly disregarding my position? How am I supposed to respond, repeat myself again and wait for you to actually work out a response?

8raz wrote:

BCFC Fan wrote:All I've seen is flawed arguements which I've shown to be false.

this is not what happened at all, you banana split.

Oh wait, an even better response.

BCFC Fan wrote:You put that you've already answered most of my points which you haven't, hardly disregarding my position? How am I supposed to respond, repeat myself again and wait for you to actually work out a response?

i literally responded to an earlier post you made, point by point, and you completely ignored giving any sort of rebuttal. the audacity to claim that you have proven anything "false" whilst completely ignoring posts which challenge your position is outstanding.

8raz wrote:

BCFC Fan wrote:You put that you've already answered most of my points which you haven't, hardly disregarding my position? How am I supposed to respond, repeat myself again and wait for you to actually work out a response?

i literally responded to an earlier post you made, point by point, and you completely ignored giving any sort of rebuttal. the audacity to claim that you have proven anything "false" whilst completely ignoring posts which challenge your position is outstanding.

I responded to every point you complete and utter fool.

you're confusing me with another poster. here's my post.

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=25888&start=61200#p2586709

Can you two take it to PM? This discussion has been done to death. To be fair you shouldn't be having an discussion with BCFC Fan. Pretty sure he is a second account.

PES Fan wrote:Can you two take it to PM? This discussion has been done to death. To be fair you shouldn't be having an discussion with BCFC Fan. Pretty sure he is a second account.

but we can use the off season to educate our fellow posters and make the world a better place

Ah right, my bad, I was the fool there then.

In response to your post.

I'm not bothered about evidence as it's clear Suarez did say what has been claimed although if Evra didn't deem it to be racist, why would he have reported it? Cause he's a banana split, that's why. If I could be bothered too, I would post the video of him using the same offensive word from youtube, but I can't.

It's nice that you're claiming that Suarez lost all support from South Americans at one point. Obviously the Man Utd players aren't going to continiously support him as it's none of their business and Evra is probably their friend off the pitch. They had already defended him originally and there wasn't a need for them to continue to do so. I recall the likes of Poyet/Uruguyan national (can't remember his name) continuing to support Suarez up until the decision and then afterwards it was pointless continuing their support after Liverpool had decided not to appeal.

It was Liverpool changing their story not Suarez, hardly his fault.

If you aren't racist and still commit racist acts, I do find that difficult to grasp, yes? I do understand what you're getting at in the sense that he did say something considered to be racist here, but as I've already said, he was undoubtedly unaware of that and should have been given a warning, not banned for 8 games as he was.

rudderless wrote:

Stig wrote:Everyone always talks about how he managed to 'save Wigan' and 'the great escape' and all that.

How did they get into those positions in the first place?

Because they often have to sell their best players to balance the books and he's constantly had to operate under very stringent financial restrictions.

It's clear he's happened across a system now that works very well for the team he has. If he can transfer that to a bigger team with more money to spend, who's to say he couldn't recreate Wigan's late season results across an entire season? I'm not saying he will, but he's earned a shot at guiding a bigger side.

He has.

What I can't understand, and I assume dissenting Liverpool fans feel the same is why Liverpool at this time?
They've just got rid of staff on the basis that they spent too much, and didn't achieve. Whoever comes in has to get results. There's no room for error. I don't understand why they would then appoint someone who is unproven with that kind of squad. It's a big gamble.

BCFC Fan wrote:Ah right, my bad, I was the fool there then.

In response to your post.

I'm not bothered about evidence

Stopped reading there.

Honestly 8raz, don't waste your time with him. I still don't believe he's a real account, no one could be that dense.

What has happened in here?
Can't you all drop it? He was banned, end off. People who are posting comments from either Evra or Suarez are just as bad the muppets giving it ' DIRTY RACIST ' ' HE HAS PREVIOUS AND HE IS FRENCH'
Just drop it, Sick to death of the same bile being spouted by some of you lot.

Nathanbrains wrote:

BCFC Fan wrote:Ah right, my bad, I was the fool there then.

In response to your post.

I'm not bothered about evidence

Stopped reading there.

Honestly 8raz, don't waste your time with him. I still don't believe he's a real account, no one could be that dense.

Well done on quoting me completely out of context, idiot.