Architecture Thread

Fed up talking videogames? Why?

Favouritie 'supertall' project?

Burj - Dubai (UAE)
5
17%
The Shard - London (UK)
9
31%
Shanghai Tower - Shanghai (China)
5
17%
India Tower - Mumbai (India)
6
21%
One World Trade Center - New York (USA)
0
No votes
Federation Tower - Moscow (Russia)
0
No votes
Pentominium - Dubai (UAE)
2
7%
Ryugyong Hotel - Pyongyang (North Korea)
2
7%
 
Total votes: 29
User avatar
Vermin
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: TimeGhost

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Vermin » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:49 pm

NickSCFC wrote:We're getting there...

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_Temple_Buddha

Image

Image


Wow.

Although it's 20 metres shorter, I still find the 'Guan Yin of the South Sea of Sanya' statue the most beautiful, for its design and its location.




NickSCFC

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by NickSCFC » Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:35 pm

Gensler's design for 'Boris Island' airport in the Thames Estuary

http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/9/330288 ... y-proposal

Image

:wub:

User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Peter Crisp » Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:48 pm

I will be named forumite of the forever before that gets built.
If we can't manage to upgrade an existing airport without decades of fuss from nimby's and legal blocks there's no hope a new airport will get the go ahead.

Vermilion wrote:I'd rather live in Luton.
NickSCFC

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by NickSCFC » Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:55 pm

My current favourite project, Namaste Tower (Mumbai)

Image

User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Alvin Flummux » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:46 pm

Grim Communist Architecture returns, after a brief delay following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Add to that the likelihood of countless cut corners and poor materials and you've got a recipe for loads of deaths.

Sky City will be the tallest building in the world standing at 838m and the construction company Broad Sustainable Building say they will build it in 3 months, to put that in perspective that’s 5 floors a day!

Sky City will be located in the city of Changsha, Hunan in the south-central China. Construction will be begin at the end of this month and will be finished by the end of March 2013. The idea may seem impossible as the current tallest building, the Burj Khalifa took over 5 years to construct but Broad Sustainable Building have a pretty impressive track record having last year built a 30 storey building in 15 days and a 15 storey building in 6 days (YouTube link below).

Sky City will have a hotel able to hold 1,000 people, a hospital, 5 schools and offices and house up to 17,000 residents. Ohh and did I mention it will have 17 helipads basically making it a mini airport!


Image



More info:
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/11/20/chi ... ?hpt=hp_c4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_City_%28Changsha%29

User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Peter Crisp » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:49 pm

5 floors a day is stupidly fast and they must be cutting corners on safety somewhere.

Vermilion wrote:I'd rather live in Luton.
User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Alvin Flummux » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:50 pm

Peter Crispmas wrote:5 floors a day is stupidly fast and they must be cutting corners on safety somewhere.


Or, you know, everywhere. :shifty:

User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Peter Crisp » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:54 pm

The likelihood of getting planning permission to build something at that pace in the UK is zero.

Vermilion wrote:I'd rather live in Luton.
User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Alvin Flummux » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:55 pm

It actually looks like something out of Sim City 2000. :shifty:

User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Peter Crisp » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:59 pm

I wonder if they will face the same problem they have with the Burj Dubai where they don't have enough electricity creating capacity to have the building more than 50% occupied.

Vermilion wrote:I'd rather live in Luton.
User avatar
1cmanny1
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: New Zealand

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by 1cmanny1 » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:29 am

Image


It looks so out of place.

Image
User avatar
Fatal Exception
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Racist chinese lover
Location: ಠ_ಠ

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Fatal Exception » Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:37 am

Some nice racism from you there Alvin ;)

The building has been designed to be built pretty quickly, and China has a fuckload of cheap labour and the actual infrastructure to build sucha monstrosity as quickly as that. It's impressive, I'm not sure how long it will last though with people living in it, no doubt it's just there to waste time until they build something even bigger.

The weird thing about China is how disposable buildings are to them. Constantly knocking down and rebuilding. My girlfriend finds it odd that in the UK we buy houses that aren't new for so much :lol:

The above post, unless specifically stated to the contrary, should not be taken seriously. If the above post has offended you in any way, please fill in this form and return it to your nearest moderator.
Image
User avatar
jamcc
Member ♥
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by jamcc » Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:18 pm

Father Exmas wrote:Some nice racism from you there Alvin ;)

The building has been designed to be built pretty quickly, and China has a fuckload of cheap labour and the actual infrastructure to build sucha monstrosity as quickly as that. It's impressive, I'm not sure how long it will last though with people living in it, no doubt it's just there to waste time until they build something even bigger.

The weird thing about China is how disposable buildings are to them. Constantly knocking down and rebuilding. My girlfriend finds it odd that in the UK we buy houses that aren't new for so much :lol:


:-| Does she not understand how much character and flair per-war buildings have and how strawberry floating bland and ugly most of the post-war stuff is? Not only that but new builds tend to be so poorly built, with corners cut everywhere (windows as small as they're allowed, etc).

User avatar
Floex
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Floex » Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:23 pm

Sky City looks like a hideous monstrosity but the Namaste Tower is a thing of beauty

User avatar
TigaSefi
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by TigaSefi » Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:25 pm

Peter Crispmas wrote:I wonder if they will face the same problem they have with the Burj Dubai where they don't have enough electricity creating capacity to have the building more than 50% occupied.


:lol: who's said this ?

Image
1 > 2 > 3 >>>>>>> 4 >>>>> 5
User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Peter Crisp » Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:54 pm

TigaSefi wrote:
Peter Crispmas wrote:I wonder if they will face the same problem they have with the Burj Dubai where they don't have enough electricity creating capacity to have the building more than 50% occupied.


:lol: who's said this ?


I've seen it in a few places because the the air conditioning puts a huge demand on the system. I'm not sure if the system is fine now but occupancy is still nowhere near full yet.
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18929271

Vermilion wrote:I'd rather live in Luton.
User avatar
OnlyShallow
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Milton Keynes

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by OnlyShallow » Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:20 pm

I'm taking my new girlfriend up the Shard tomorrow. It will be our first time and she is a little bit scared. I've told her we'll get lubricated before we tackle the enormous erection.

Image
Many Lives -> 49 MP wrote:People like you OnlyShallow are terrible banana splits. I hate you forever.
User avatar
Fatal Exception
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Racist chinese lover
Location: ಠ_ಠ

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Fatal Exception » Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:29 pm

OnlyShallow wrote:I'm taking my new girlfriend up the Shard tomorrow. It will be our first time and she is a little bit scared. I've told her we'll get lubricated before we tackle the enormous erection.

Image

The above post, unless specifically stated to the contrary, should not be taken seriously. If the above post has offended you in any way, please fill in this form and return it to your nearest moderator.
Image
User avatar
Fatal Exception
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Racist chinese lover
Location: ಠ_ಠ

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by Fatal Exception » Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:31 pm

Seriously, the shard is a piece of gooseberry fool. It's an embarrassment how much they are charging just to go up a gooseberry fool tier skyscraper.

The above post, unless specifically stated to the contrary, should not be taken seriously. If the above post has offended you in any way, please fill in this form and return it to your nearest moderator.
Image
User avatar
OnlyShallow
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Milton Keynes

PostRe: Architecture Thread
by OnlyShallow » Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:36 pm

It is a bit expensive, but I'm not the one paying for it.

Image
Many Lives -> 49 MP wrote:People like you OnlyShallow are terrible banana splits. I hate you forever.

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Garth, Green Gecko, Grumpy David, Neo Cortex, TonyDA, Vermilion and 297 guests