NickSCFC wrote:http://m.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jul/04/london-shard-opens-to-fanfare
I like it. It looks beautiful in that pic. As much as it stings many of us that a foreign-owned symbol of inequality was officially opened to Fanfare for the Common Man, one only has to take a look back at the petition against the Eiffel Tower launch at the World's Fair to get the idea that time will be be the official judge, as it's how the structure stands compared to older
and newer buildings within context.
French people including Guy de Maupassant, Alexandre Dumas and Emile Zola wrote:
Are we going to let all [the sights of Paris] be desecrated? Is the City of Paris going to keep on associating itself with the baroque and mercantile imagination of a machine-maker, irretrievably losing its beauty and honour?
The Eiffel Tower, which business-like America itself would reject is, make no mistake, the dishonour of Paris. Everyone feels it, everyone reads it, everyone is deeply sad about it. When foreigner come to visit our World Fair, they will shout in astonishment: “What? Is this horror what the French have come up with to give us an idea of their good taste?” And they will be right to mock us, because the Paris of sublime gothic architecture, the Paris of Jean Goujon, of Germain Pilon, of Puget, of Rude, of Barye etc… will have become the Paris of Mr Eiffel.
To understand what we are talking about, all you need do is figure a dizzyingly ridiculous tower domineering Paris like a black and gigantic factory chimney, crushing with its barbaric mass Notre-Dame, the Sainte-Chapelle, the Tour Saint-Jacques, the Louvre, the Dôme des Invalides, the Arc de Triomphe, all our monuments humiliated, our very architecture shrunk, disappearing in this mind-boggling dream.