At the request of Mike Hunt and to save the politics thread being overrun by this new "news" channel, here's a thread to laugh at/shout at/worship at Andrew Neil's altar of right wing unwokeness.
I put it on for a laugh at 10 last night and it opened with some ridiculous hideous banana split interviewing that strawberry floating prick 'Loz Fox', who clearly thinks the world owes him a favour. It was horrific. The subject was something like 'Has woke culture gone too far?' and I had to switch over after no more than 3-4 minutes.
Fortunately, I switched over to BBC News and it was great fun because they were going through those WhatsApp messages Johnson sent to Cummings, which made for solid entertainment!
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:I put it on for a laugh at 10 last night and it opened with some ridiculous hideous banana split interviewing that strawberry floating prick 'Loz Fox', who clearly thinks the world owes him a favour. It was horrific.
Be nice to him. He's just been forced to hand back the only acting award he's ever won.
Giving back your Specsavers Golden Dagger award in protest of Specsavers pulling ads from the interview where you didn't notice the dude flashing his arse in the mirror.
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:I put it on for a laugh at 10 last night and it opened with some ridiculous hideous banana split interviewing that strawberry floating prick 'Loz Fox', who clearly thinks the world owes him a favour. It was horrific.
Be nice to him. He's just been forced to hand back the only acting award he's ever won.
Skarjo wrote:Giving back your Specsavers Golden Dagger award in protest of Specsavers pulling ads from the interview where you didn't notice the dude flashing his arse in the mirror.
What strawberry floating timeline is this.
He's not even really telling the truth there. He won an audience award for "best duo", so it was an award for "Best Sidekick" at best.
Skarjo wrote:Giving back your Specsavers Golden Dagger award in protest of Specsavers pulling ads from the interview where you didn't notice the dude flashing his arse in the mirror.
What strawberry floating timeline is this.
He's not even really telling the truth there. He won an audience award for "best duo", so it was an award for "Best Sidekick" at best.
Do you think he needs the express permission of Kevin Whately to give it back? Or is it maybe like a joint account that any one holder can drain all the money from?
Skarjo wrote:Giving back your Specsavers Golden Dagger award in protest of Specsavers pulling ads from the interview where you didn't notice the dude flashing his arse in the mirror.
What strawberry floating timeline is this.
He's not even really telling the truth there. He won an audience award for "best duo", so it was an award for "Best Sidekick" at best.
Do you think he needs the express permission of Kevin Whately to give it back? Or is it maybe like a joint account that any one holder can drain all the money from?
I don't think the award was even sponsored by Specsavers when he won a joint award off the back of Kevin Whately. Wikipedia suggests it was only sponsored by Specsavers in 2014.
Surely this channel is doomed to imminent failure if so many advertisers are already pulling out? I imagine it wasn't far off a knife edge already in terms of financial stability. Hopefully it drains the pockets of some wealthy shitlords before they pull the plug.
Skarjo wrote:Giving back your Specsavers Golden Dagger award in protest of Specsavers pulling ads from the interview where you didn't notice the dude flashing his arse in the mirror.
It reads like a load of "hugely successful" people of low/mediocre talent that have spent years making their successful product trying to do it solo.
The arrogant sods never realised they were being supported by a large team of staff (who I'm guessing they don't appreciate, after all THEY'RE the stars who make the show successful) who actually are very good at their job.
And now they're finding out all the bits they dismissed as easy and/or unimportant which the little people did actually matter.
I mean there's basic cheap youtube shows that have better production values than this shower. It's so many basic mistakes.
Hexx wrote:It reads like a load of "hugely successful" people of low/mediocre talent that have spent years making their successful product trying to do it solo.
Andrew Neil seemed angry that someone suggested Dan Wooton was the main presenter rather than him earlier.
It is very satisfying to think of a group of rich white people, who have achieved success largely thanks to their privilege, finding out that actually none of them are very good and going down with their failed enterprise because they shunned all the genuinely talented/useful people on the basis of some idiotic ideology.