GBeebies Talk Trash - TalkTV to close television channel and move 'online only'

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Garth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Norn Iron

PostRe: GBeebies Talk Trash - TalkTV to close television channel and move 'online only'
by Garth » Wed Apr 24, 2024 9:41 am

twitter.com/Haggis_UK/status/1783048410188103788


User avatar
Drumstick
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: GBeebies Talk Trash - TalkTV to close television channel and move 'online only'
by Drumstick » Wed Apr 24, 2024 11:58 am

What's the point in a regulator which won't enforce its own regulations?

Spineless.

Check out my YouTube channel!
One man should not have this much power in this game. Luckily I'm not an ordinary man.
Image Image Image
User avatar
rinks
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Aboard the train that goes around the world

PostRe: GBeebies Talk Trash - TalkTV to close television channel and move 'online only'
by rinks » Wed Apr 24, 2024 12:37 pm

I’m just off to do some creative shoplifting.

User avatar
Garth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Norn Iron

PostRe: GBeebies Talk Trash - TalkTV to close television channel and move 'online only'
by Garth » Wed Apr 24, 2024 6:14 pm

Ofcom says it won't shut down GB News, is unsure if Farage counts as a politician: https://inews.co.uk/news/ofcom-says-it- ... an-3021317

Today programme presenter Nick Robinson asked Ofcom on X, formerly Twitter: "The leader of the Reform party Richard Tice & its only MP Lee Anderson can present programmes in the run up to the (general election) campaign alongside Jacob Rees-Mogg. Is that your idea of impartiality?" Robinson also questioned how Reform founder Mr Farage could present an "impartial" programme during the campaign.

Cristina Nicolotti Squires, the Ofcom executive responsible for broadcast regulation, told i: "There are some people who won't be happy unless we shut GB News down tomorrow and that's not the kind of country we live in. We're not censors." She added: "Nick [Robinson] would be the first one to be cross if Ofcom told him how Today ought to be. We live in a country with editorial freedom and the right for broadcasters to decide how they make programmes. It's up to them to make them impartial."

Ofcom has said candidates at the upcoming general election are not allowed to host any programmes during the campaign.

The regulator will rule on whether Mr Farage is defined as a "politician" when it publishes the outcome of an impartiality complaint over his show. The Reform figurehead has yet to confirm if he will stand for parliament at the next election.

If Mr Farage was a Reform spokesman but didn't stand, Ofcom's rules suggest he would still be able to present "non-news current affairs programmes" until polling day.

She also rejected criticism from Andrew Neil, GB News's short-lived frontline presenter, who told a parliamentary select committee this week that Ofcom should show some "backbone" and take action against the channel.

"We've given GB News eleven breaches so far," Ms Squires said. "We've put them on notice that further breaches of the code will be taken incredibly seriously and possibly lead to sanctions."

Ofcom was not "scared" to fine GB News, if it is found guilty of repeated breaches, she said.

User avatar
Met
Member
Joined in 2015

PostRe: GBeebies Talk Trash - TalkTV to close television channel and move 'online only'
by Met » Wed Apr 24, 2024 6:18 pm

You know what they say: 12 strikes and you get a slap on the wrist!

User avatar
Rocsteady
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: GBeebies Talk Trash - TalkTV to close television channel and move 'online only'
by Rocsteady » Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:30 pm

Garth wrote:

twitter.com/Haggis_UK/status/1782777525002731843


He can get strawberry floated. His DM column a couple of weeks ago opened with JK Rowling not being just a national hero, but a global hero.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: GBeebies Talk Trash - TalkTV to close television channel and move 'online only'
by Moggy » Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:38 pm

Rocsteady wrote:
Garth wrote:

twitter.com/Haggis_UK/status/1782777525002731843


He can get strawberry floated. His DM column a couple of weeks ago opened with JK Rowling not being just a national hero, but a global hero.


He hates conspiracy theories and anti-vax type bullshit though.

During Neil's time as editor, The Sunday Times backed a campaign to falsely claim that HIV was not a cause of AIDS.[31][109][110][111] In 1990, The Sunday Times serialised a book by an American right-winger who rejected the scientific consensus on the causes of AIDS, and who falsely claimed that AIDS could not spread to heterosexuals.[110] Articles and editorials in The Sunday Times cast doubt on the scientific consensus, described HIV as a "politically correct virus" about which there was a "conspiracy of silence," disputed that AIDS was spreading in Africa, claimed that tests for HIV were invalid, described the HIV/AIDS treatment drug azidothymidine (AZT) as harmful, and characterised the World Health Organization (WHO) as an "Empire-building AIDS [organisation]."[110]

The pseudoscientific coverage of HIV/AIDS in The Sunday Times led the scientific journal Nature to monitor the newspaper's coverage and to publish letters rebutting the falsehoods printed in The Sunday Times.[110] In response to this, The Sunday Times published an article headlined "AIDS – why we won't be silenced", which said that Nature engaged in censorship and "sinister intent".[110] In his 1996 book, Full Disclosure, Neil wrote that his HIV/AIDS denialism "deserved publication to encourage debate."[110] That same year, he wrote that The Sunday Times had been vindicated in its coverage, "The Sunday Times was one of a handful of newspapers, perhaps the most prominent, which argued that heterosexual Aids was a myth. The figures are now in and this newspaper stands totally vindicated... The history of Aids is one of the great scandals of our time. I do not blame doctors and the Aids lobby for warning that everybody might be at risk in the early days, when ignorance was rife and reliable evidence scant." He criticised the "AIDS establishment" and said "Aids had become an industry, a job-creation scheme for the caring classes."[112]

In a 2021 interview Neil said that he now regretted certain aspects of the paper's coverage of HIV and AIDS, but he was unwilling or unable to accept any personal responsibility for the falsehoods published while he was editor. Neil chose instead to blame an employee, stating that he had placed faith in a trusted correspondent who was found to be wrong.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Neil


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: addsy087, Gideon, mcjihge2, more heat than light, Rich, Vermilion, wensleydale and 260 guests